Category Archives: Women in Computing

Goldsmiths to host ‘Love and Sex with Robots’ conference

The International Congress on Love and Sex with Robots – two days of talks and workshops exploring the human relationship with artificial partners – will be held at Goldsmiths, University of London from 19-20 December 2016.

Within the fields of Human-Computer Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction, we have recently seen a strong upsurge of interest in the more personal aspects of human relationships with developing technology.

A growing interest in the subject is apparent among the general public, as evidenced by an increase in coverage in the print media, TV documentaries and feature films, but also within the academic community.

In September 2015 a short article titled ‘In Defence of Sex Robots’ by Goldsmiths computing lecturer Dr Kate Devlin was published by The Conversation and has gone on to reach more than half a million readers in several languages. It is one of the website’s all-time most popular essays.

Dr Devlin is organising the conference at Goldsmiths to bring together a community of academics, industry professionals and anyone else interested in sex robots, to present and discuss innovative new work and research.

Sessions are planned on humanoid robots, robot emotions and personalities, teledildonics, intelligent electronic sex hardware, entertainment robots and much more. logoPresentations will take a range of approaches, from the psychological to the sociological and philosophical.

Dr Devlin argues that gender stereotypes and sexual objectification have long been prevalent themes in existing research and popular representations of sex and robots, and this is a narrative that must be challenged.

“Our research aims to carve a new narrative, moving away from sex robots purely defined as machines used as sex objects, as substitutes for human partners, made by men, for men,” she explains.

A machine is a blank slate – it is what we make of it. Why should a sex robot be binary? What about the potential for therapy? It’s time for new approaches to artificial sexuality.
“Cutting edge research in technology and ethics is vital if we want to reframe ideas about the human-tech relationship.”

The conference will be chaired by Dr Kate Devlin, Professor Adrian Cheok (City, University of London) and Dr David Levy (Intelligent Toys Ltd). A full line-up of speakers will be confirmed in October.


Registration and further information is available at loveandsexwithrobots.org


This blogpost is an adaptation of a news story published by Sarah Cox on 17 Oct 2016.

Goldsmiths Showoff: STRANGE DAYS

image-1-php

What happens if you fill a pub with clever and lovely people then invite loads of amazing Goldsmiths academics to entertain them?

Join us for a chaotic cabaret in the pub featuring a line-up of Goldsmiths experts who will reflect on the strange, dark time that has been 2016.

When: 6:30pm – 9:30pm Thursday 3 November 2016
Where: Amersham Arms, 388 New Cross Road, London SE14 6TY
Tickets: £6/£5 + booking fee. Buy online

In 2016 we entered the Darkest Timeline: Brexit, Bowie… Trump? Join us at the Amersham Arms on 3 November – days before the most powerful nation on earth shows us how broken democracy really is – to hear Goldsmiths, University of London academics take you on a high-speed dash through their chosen subject.

Featuring the algorithms of online dating, hidden satanic messages, cats and class war. Expect laughs, facts that sound totally made up but aren’t, and loads of terrible PowerPoints.

Comedian and compere Steve Cross will once again keep everyone to time.

The line-up:

  • Kate Devlin (Computing) on the algorithms of online dating: a scientific and a personal perspective
  • Sylvia Pan (Computing) – What can virtual humans do for us?
  • Rob Cenci (Media & Communications) on the Call of Insecurity – the first-person shooter
  • Sarah Wiseman (Computing) on the weird and wonderful world of the Quantified Self
  • Chris French (Psychology) on hidden satanic messages – find out if you can hear them
  • Dee Harding (Computing) – Tired of Experts
  • John Price (History) – No Hard Felines: Class War… with cats
  • Dominique Santos (Anthropology) on the Anthropology of NOT climbing trees

When: 6:30pm – 9:30pm Thursday 3 November 2016
Where: Amersham Arms, 388 New Cross Road, London SE14 6TY
Tickets: £6/£5 + booking fee. Buy online

All proceeds from ticket sales will go to The Running Charity.

Grow your own art! How generative artists combine rules with chaos

'L-Pattern' by Angie Fang http://bongbongsquare.com/2014/05/569
‘L-Pattern’ by MFA Computational Arts graduate Angie Fang

What is generative art, and how is it different from traditional art? Ahead of a teacher training day this October, Theo Papatheodorou, course leader of Goldsmiths’ MA/MFA in Computational Arts, explains.


There are many ways of drawing. The traditional way involves taking a pen or pencil and trying to represent an object or a scene. You are in control of the process, so outcome is somewhat predictable.

The generative way of drawing involves relinquishing some of that control. Instead of making images, you make a set of rules (often nowadays executed by a computer program) which generate artworks autonomously.

But generative art is not purely determistic. Randomness adds unpredictability to the final result; at various points the program reaches a fork in the road, and the path taken is chosen by sheer chance. So despite being produced by cold processes, generative art often appears organic, and contains a level of complexity that would be impossible for an artist to produce on their own. The artist is like a gardener; she sows the seeds and tends the shoots – and then waits for something extraordinary to develop.


“Generative artists are chaos artists. They have bred the unpredictable, welcomed it, harnessed it and can fashion it into pleasing forms.” Matt Pearson


Generative art is an important element of our BSc Digital Arts Computing, BSc Creative Computing and MA/MFA Computational Arts degrees at Goldsmiths.

Recent graduate Angie Fang was inspired by time-lapse photography to create digitally-generated flower blooms. Random audio input determines the size and location of each petal, creating a unique blossom every time. It’s this mix of the real and the virtual, the organic and mechanical that makes Angie Fang’s work so interesting.

Another student, Lior Ben Gai created a system which ‘grew’ artificial bacterial colonies. He based his work on cellular automata, in which complexity emerges from a simple set of rules. At our recent degree show, visitors manipulate the growth of Lior’s digital colonies by shining a lamp onto a photosensitive petri dish.

Generative processes don’t only result in digital images. The choreographer Merce Cunningham famously threw dice during his performances to decide what the next steps should be. John Cage used the I Ching to decide the sounds, durations and tempo of Music of Changes (1951). Beijing National Stadium, too, was designed generatively. Generative art provides endless possibilities for creativity.


We’re running a special training day on Wednesday 26 October 2016, where we invite art teachers to learn some basic generative drawing techniques, understand how generative art fits within the wider context of art history, and develop ideas for delivering this content in the classroom. Book your place


Dr Theo Papatheodorou is the course leader of Goldsmiths’ Bsc Digital Arts Computing and MA/MFA Computational Arts. He is the founder of visualcortex.cc, a creative technology studio developing installations and interactive projections for live performances. Email him at t.papatheodorou@gold.ac.uk

VICE interviews Dr Sarah Wiseman on being a lecturer in her twenties

wiseman

VICE magazine recently asked three university lecturers: ‘What’s it like to lecture at university while you’re in your twenties?’

One of them was Dr Sarah Wiseman, 29, a research and teaching fellow in the computing department at Goldsmiths University of London. She leads lab sessions, talking to around 50 students at a time, and also has some experience lecturing. Here’s what she said…

“I actually hope the students still think of me as a young person – maybe I’m just getting old and desperately want that to be the case,” she laughs. “I was a bit nervous at first, but I’ve learned a lot after a few years of teaching. I’ve learned it’s absolutely OK to admit you don’t know the answer to something. You’d look like an idiot otherwise. And I’ve learned to freestyle a bit, rather than stick to a script.”

Sarah has taken part in Science Showoff gigs designed to help young academics become more confident public speakers by getting them to do stand-up comedy about their research. “It was kind of terrifying, and definitely put the teaching into perspective,” she says.

When it comes to socialising, Sarah thinks it’s important to maintain a very clear boundary between undergraduate students and academics. “You want to be approachable… but it’s about being viewed as a professional, rather than a friend,” she explains. “There is a culture of end-of-the-day drinks among colleagues in my department, but not with the students. In fact, we do need to be a bit careful about what pubs to go to in the New Cross area to make sure there aren’t awkward encounters.”

Queens of Tech: Talks by inspiring c♀mputer scientists

queentech_pink

15% of Goldsmiths Computing students are women. Although that’s double the national average for university computing departments, it’s nowhere near good enough. So we’re aiming for 50%. 

Join us for Goldsmiths’ new Women in Computing speaker series. These remarkable computer scientists will talk about their work – and inspire you to be part of the next generation of amazing women in tech.


Thurs 16 June: Dr Kate Devlin _ My Life with the Sex Robots

kate-vicar-long

Dr Kate Devlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Computing at Goldsmiths, University of London. This evening she gives a lively overview of her career and her current research on sexual companion robots.

Kate has a background in both archaeology and computer science and has combined these with applied perception, focusing on digital cultural heritage. She is an active campaigner for mental health awareness and also for raising the profile of women in computing.

Where: Room 342, Richard Hoggart Building, Goldsmiths
When: 6:30 – 8pm Thursday 16 June 2016
Book your free ticket


Thurs 23 June: Susan Stepney _ Can slime mould compute?

susan-stepney
If you have a PC, tablet, or smartphone, you have used a computer. But some people use billard balls, beams of light, sticks of wood, chemicals, bacteria, slime moulds, spaghetti, even black holes, as computers (although some of these only in theory!).

How can these things be computers? What can we do? Can they do things your smartphone can’t? And why are these people using such peculoar things to compute with, anyway?

Susan Stepney is Professor of Computer Science at the University of York, Department of Computer Science. In this informal lecture, she discusses her career and research in non-standard computation, biologically-inspired computational models, and emergent systems.

Where: Room 342, Richard Hoggart Building, Goldsmiths
When: 6:30 – 8pm Thursday 23 June 2016
Book your free ticket


Thurs 30 June: Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy _ Inventing the TV of the future

VV

Vinoba is an R&D Engineer for the BBC, working within Broadcast & Connected Systems. She thinks up new types of synchronised companion screen experiences for connected homes. Currently, this ranges from building prototypes for new & archived content to running exploratory studies to gauge how our audiences might react to them.

Previously, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy focused on building prototypes that combine content on social networks with programmes being played on a connected TV.

Where: Room 342, Richard Hoggart Building, Goldsmiths
When: 6:30 – 8pm Thursday 30 June 2016
Book your free ticket


More posts involving Women in Computing

Goldsmiths research student builds Daphne Oram’s unfinished ‘Mini-Oramics’

Unknown-2

A Goldsmiths Computing researcher has built a music synthesiser and sequencer designed – but never realised – by electronic music pioneer Daphne Oram more than 40 years ago.

PhD student Tom Richards has spent the last three years poring over an unfinished project by Daphne Oram (1925 – 2003), one of the central figures in the development of British experimental electronic music.

Daphne Oram
Daphne Oram

Oram was the co-founder and first director of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop, and is credited with the invention of a new form of ‘drawn sound’ synthesis – Oramics, which was recently the subject of the ‘Oramics to Electronica’ exhibition at the Science Museum.

The original Oramics machine was designed in the early to mid 1960s and was built with funding from the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

It was different to many early forms of electronic synthesisers: the composer/musician drew onto a set of 35mm film strips which ran past a series of photo-electric cells, generating electrical signals to control amplitude, timbre, frequency and duration.

The original Oramics Machine was the size of a large office photocopier, so was too cumbersome for the average musician. In the early 1970s Oram began work on Mini-Oramics (perhaps inspired by Moog’s development of the Minimoog), but as far as we know she never completed a prototype.

“There were a lot of reasons why she didn’t launch Mini-Oramics,” explains Tom. “She was working on her own, she wasn’t affiliated to a large organisation or university.

“She had ups and downs in her life, and at the time she was working on Mini-Oramics, she also worried that her approach to musical research was out of fashion when compared to chance-based and computerised techniques. She was unable to secure the further funding she needed and she eventually moved on to other research.

“In an alternate universe, Mini-Oramics might have become an actual product, bought and used by musicians all over the world.”

Dr Mick Grierson, director of Goldsmiths’ Daphne Oram Archive, and Tim Boon head of research at the Science Museum, invited Tom Richards to do a practice led PhD on the subject of Oramics. Tom decided to re-imagine and then build Mini-Oramics.

“The rules were simple. I had to imagine I was building the machine in 1973, interpreting Daphne Oram’s plans and using only the technologies that existed at that time.”

Tom is now working with six contemporary composers, giving each of them a few days to play with the Mini-Oramics machine.

One of the composers, London-based sound artist Ain Bailey has recently been working with the MiniOramics synthesiser. “It’s a fantastic instrument. I’m not a formally-trained musician, so it’s been great to work with an instrument where I can create the sounds graphically,” she said.

Other composers working with MiniOramics include James Bulley (see video above), John Lely Jo Thomas, Head of Goldsmiths Electronic Studios Ian Stonehouse and Rebecca Fiebrink.

Tom adds: “This is an opportunity to experience what it would have been like to use Mini-Oramics, had Oram managed to complete it. It’s a way to test how important her ideas were, and to consider how influential she could have been.”


Computational Arts graduate wins £5,000 Aspen Online Art Award 2016

final1.103537

Goldsmiths alumna Matilda Skelton Mace has been announced as the winner of the Aspen Online Art Award 2016.

Matilda Skelton Mace graduated from Goldsmiths’ MA/MFA Computational Arts programme in 2015. She is a London-based artist and designer, working with the building blocks of reality- space, light, and geometric form. She is interested in the ‘in between’, exploring ideas of implied, imagined and virtual space, the dissonance that can arise between real and virtual and the way we perceive it.

Last year she was shortlisted for the HIX Award and has exhibited installations at galleries, nightclubs and festivals. This year her work is centred on providing visuals for music events by promoters including Gottwood festival, Inverted Audio and Blueprint Records.

'Party at our place'. Projection mapping and sculpture, 2015.
‘Party at our place’. Matilda Skelton Mace, 2015. Projection mapping and sculpture.

As winner of the Aspen Online Art Award, Matilda has been commissioned to create a virtual world based on the unique digital ‘fingerprints’ of visitors to their website.

Drawing on the phenomenon of ‘Sky Islands’ – mountains with unique flora and fauna caused by climatic isolation from the surrounding lowland – users’ metadata are used to create particular landforms with their own plants and weather systems. Visitors with matching characteristics (for example using the same hardware or operating system) generate landforms in a similar location to eventually build up a mountain range corresponding to correlations in metadata. Their weather and plant life reflects the geographical location of the user. Visitors can explore this expanding world and a visual representation of metadata profiling emerges, with its implications for anonymity rights and freedom of expression.

Launched in 2014 by Aspen Insurance Holdings in association with the Contemporary Art Society, the Aspen Online Art Award is the first of its kind in the UK.

The judges, who included Attilia Fattori Franchini, Curator, and the Aspen Art Committee, selected Skelton Mace from a shortlist of seven artists to win a commissioning prize of £5,000 and the opportunity to create a new online-based work for Aspen’s renowned art collection.

Attilia Fattori Franchini said: “This award is a fantastic opportunity for an emerging artist and the strength of Matilda’s proposal shows that she is one to watch. It will also sit particularly well within Aspen’s collection as her ideas around data privacy and cyber risk are particularly pertinent to our contemporary culture.”

Lanny Walker, Art Consultant at the Contemporary Art Society, said: “Matilda’s artwork explores many themes relevant to current debates within contemporary art and beyond, where identity, data privacy and our virtual footprint are continuous concerns. In this she follows in the footsteps of artists including Hito Steyerl, Oliver Laric and Heath Bunting, who touch upon these issues in their own practices.”

This year’s shortlist was dominated by Goldsmiths’ 2015 Computational Arts graduates, with Lior Ben Gai and Angie Fang also nominated.